Operating Framework
How judgement, structure, and institutional control are applied in regulated payment environments
RESOLUTES operates through a defined operating framework that governs how decisions are made, how processes are stabilised, and how operating structures mature under regulatory and audit constraint.
The framework is applied deliberately and progressively, depending on context and institutional readiness.

Purpose Of The Operating Framework
In regulated payment environments, outcomes are determined less by technology choice and more by decision discipline, governance clarity, and structural consistency.
The Operating Framework exists to:
-
prevent fragmentation as scale increases,
-
reduce dependence on individuals and informal practices,
-
and ensure that regulatory and operational intent is enforced systematically.
This framework governs how RESOLUTES works, independent of engagement size, duration, or commercial structure.
Framework Structure
The Operating Framework is applied through three distinct layers. Each layer addresses a different class of institutional requirement.
The layers are not interchangeable and are not always applied simultaneously.
Advisory Layer
Scope and Boundaries
The Advisory Layer addresses decisions that cannot be delegated to vendors, tooling, or documentation.
It is engaged where judgement must be exercised under regulatory, governance, and long-term institutional constraint.
Scope of the Advisory Layer
The Advisory Layer covers:
-
Regulatory interpretation and positioning
-
Sponsor-bank alignment logic
-
Governance model design
-
Decision precedence under audit and scale
-
Structural choices with long-term consequence
This layer focuses on decision quality, not execution output.
Boundaries of the Advisory Layer
The Advisory Layer does not:
-
provide execution labour,
-
replace internal management,
-
act as an outsourced compliance function,
-
or produce generic recommendations.
Its purpose is to stabilise judgement before structure is applied
Codify Layer
Framework Types
The Codified Layer exists to ensure that judgement does not remain person-dependent or conversational.
Insights derived through the Advisory Layer are translated internally into repeatable, auditable operating structures.
Types of Frameworks Codified
The Codified Layer typically results in frameworks covering:
-
Operating models and control definitions.
-
Merchant onboarding and KYC governance.
-
Settlement and reconciliation structures.
-
Role clarity and accountability matrices.
-
Audit-defensible documentation systems.
-
Exception handling and escalation logic
These frameworks are designed to be:
-
repeatable,
-
auditable,
-
and resilient under scale.
What Codification Achieves
Without codification:
-
exceptions become routine,
-
interpretation varies across teams,
-
and scale amplifies inconsistency.
Codification does not eliminate judgement. It contains and preserves it.
Core Architecture
Scope
The Core Architecture is the internal foundational layer that ensures consistency of controls, workflows, and governance logic across engagements. It functions as an internal reference system, preventing re-invention of operating logic and preserving institutional memory.
Scope of the Core Architecture
The Core Architecture encompasses:
-
control logic definitions,
-
governance rule enforcement,
-
workflow consistency models,
-
and internal reference structures.
Its purpose is structural integrity, not operational execution.
Explicit Boundaries (Important)
The Core Architecture is:
-
internal and non-commercial,
-
non-transactional,
-
not a payment platform,
-
not a processor,
-
and does not hold or move funds.
How The Layers Interact
The Operating Framework enforces directional flow:
Advisory Layer → Codified Layer → Core Architecture
The reverse flow is intentionally avoided.
-
Codification without judgement leads to rigidity.
-
Architecture without codification leads to opacity.
Each layer exists to prevent a specific institutional failure mode.
What The Operating Framework Explicitly Excludes
The framework intentionally avoids:
-
one-size-fits-all models,
-
tool-first problem solving,
-
compliance treated purely as documentation,
-
and growth without governance transition.
These approaches may optimise speed but weaken institutional resilience.
Institutions are not built by acceleration alone. They are built through consistent application of judgement, structure, and constraint. This Operating Framework exists to make that consistency deliberate rather than accidental.

